Discussion:
Hicks offers a glimmer of hope for Trump's defense
(too old to reply)
Leroy N. Soetoro
2024-05-05 19:54:37 UTC
Permalink
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/03/trump-hush-money-trial-hope-
hicks-testimony-00156137

NEW YORK — In a trial that turns on a hush money payment to a porn star,
Donald Trump loyalist Hope Hicks offered emotional testimony Friday that
portrayed him as a family man.

The testimony of Hicks, Trump’s former communications aide for his 2016
presidential campaign and his White House communications director, marked
perhaps the first boost to Trump’s defense since the trial started — even
though she was called to the stand by the prosecution.

Hicks was one of the most highly anticipated witnesses of the trial, which
has now finished its third week. She spoke softly in her first few moments
on the stand, admitting she was nervous.

Trump’s lawyers have argued that Trump’s motivation in seeking to silence
the accounts of two women — former Playboy model Karen McDougal and porn
star Stormy Daniels — who claimed sexual encounters with him wasn’t to
help his 2016 presidential campaign, as prosecutors have alleged, but
instead to protect his family. The motive is important because, in trying
to convict Trump of 34 felonies, prosecutors are seeking to link allegedly
fraudulent business records with violations of election law.

During her roughly three hours of testimony, Hicks offered some ammunition
for both sides. She testified that Trump told her in February 2018 that it
was preferable that the Daniels story became public after the election,
instead of before it. But she also said his interest in suppressing the
allegations from the women stemmed from his desire to shield his wife,
Melania.

After the Wall Street Journal published an article on Nov. 4, 2016, that
detailed the hush money payment to McDougal and mentioned Daniels, Hicks
said Trump was “concerned how it would be viewed by his wife,” and said
Trump asked Hicks to ensure that newspapers weren’t delivered to their
residence that morning.

She also testified that she didn’t believe Trump was specifically
concerned with how the story might impact his presidential campaign.
Prosecutors have argued that, in the wake of the “Access Hollywood” tape,
which had been made public a few weeks earlier, Trump sought to conceal
other unflattering stories about his conduct with women to protect his
political interests.

But Hicks said Trump did not seem overly concerned about the public
response to the tape, on which he is heard bragging about grabbing women’s
genitals. Trump, she said, believed the tape “wasn’t good,” but also was
“pretty standard stuff for two guys chatting.”

And again, Hicks testified that Trump’s main worry was his wife.
“President Trump really values Mrs. Trump’s opinion, and she doesn’t weigh
in all the time, but when she does it’s really meaningful to him.”

“He really, really respects what she has to say,” she continued. “I think
he was just concerned about what her perception of this would be.”

Still, elements of Hicks’ testimony are sure to help prosecutors’ case.
She described the fallout of the “Access Hollywood” tape as “intense,” so
much so that it overtook news coverage of a category 4 hurricane that had
been expected to make landfall on the East Coast.

She recounted how she and other campaign aides scrambled to respond to the
revelation. “There was consensus amongst us all that the tape was damaging
and this was a crisis,” she said.

And she recalled a conversation she had with Trump about a phone call he
had with his lawyer, Michael Cohen, the morning after Cohen told the New
York Times that he alone had paid the $130,000 to Daniels, without Trump’s
involvement.

“Mr. Trump was saying he had spoken to Michael and that Michael had paid
this woman to protect him from a false allegation,” she recalled. “And
that Michael felt like it was his job to protect him, and that that’s what
he was doing. And he did it out of the kindness of his own heart and he
never told anybody about it.”

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo asked if that version of the events was
consistent with Hicks’ perception of Cohen, and Hicks offered a response
that suggested she didn’t believe Trump’s account of what had happened.

“I would say that would be out of character for Michael,” she said. “I
didn’t know Michael to be an especially charitable person or selfless
person,“ she said, describing him as “the kind of person who seeks
credit.”

Hicks said Trump told her “that he thought it was a generous thing to do,
and he was appreciative of the loyalty.” She also said Trump asked her if
it was preferable that they were contending with the story after the
election.

“Mr. Trump’s opinion was that it was better to be dealing with it now and
that it would have been bad to have that put out before the election,” she
testified.

That comment, perhaps the most damaging for Trump of Hicks’s testimony
because it aligned with prosecutors’ theory that Trump was seeking to
protect his campaign, marked the end of the direct examination of Hicks.
Moments later, she appeared overwhelmed with emotion, tearing up on the
witness stand and blotting her eyes with a tissue.

Justice Juan Merchan took a short break, allowing her to exit the room,
and when she returned, her eyes were red.

During cross-examination, Trump lawyer Emil Bove sought to distance Cohen
from Trump’s presidential campaign operations. Bove asked Hicks if Cohen
did things that “were frustrating” to the campaign, or that were
“unauthorized,” and if he “went rogue at times.”

“Yes,” Hicks replied.

Bove asked if Cohen did things that were not helpful to the campaign.

“Yes. I used to say that he liked to call himself a fixer or Mr. Fix It,
and it was only because he first broke it,” she said, laughing, “that he
was able to fix it.”

Before she left the stand, she offered one last bit of solace for her
former boss. Asked whether the Oval Office was a “chaotic” place in 2017,
she agreed, but cautioned that it wasn’t in a “bad way.”

As she responded, Trump attorney Todd Blanche, seated next to Trump,
flashed her a smile.
--
We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.
pothead
2024-05-05 23:08:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/03/trump-hush-money-trial-hope-
hicks-testimony-00156137
NEW YORK — In a trial that turns on a hush money payment to a porn star,
https://people.howstuffworks.com/15-notable-people-who-dropped-out-of-school.htm
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
Donald Trump loyalist Hope Hicks offered emotional testimony Friday that
portrayed him as a family man.
The testimony of Hicks, Trump’s former communications aide for his 2016
presidential campaign and his White House communications director, marked
perhaps the first boost to Trump’s defense since the trial started — even
though she was called to the stand by the prosecution.
Hicks was one of the most highly anticipated witnesses of the trial, which
has now finished its third week. She spoke softly in her first few moments
on the stand, admitting she was nervous.
Trump’s lawyers have argued that Trump’s motivation in seeking to silence
the accounts of two women — former Playboy model Karen McDougal and porn
star Stormy Daniels — who claimed sexual encounters with him wasn’t to
help his 2016 presidential campaign, as prosecutors have alleged, but
instead to protect his family. The motive is important because, in trying
to convict Trump of 34 felonies, prosecutors are seeking to link allegedly
fraudulent business records with violations of election law.
During her roughly three hours of testimony, Hicks offered some ammunition
for both sides. She testified that Trump told her in February 2018 that it
was preferable that the Daniels story became public after the election,
instead of before it. But she also said his interest in suppressing the
allegations from the women stemmed from his desire to shield his wife,
Melania.
After the Wall Street Journal published an article on Nov. 4, 2016, that
detailed the hush money payment to McDougal and mentioned Daniels, Hicks
said Trump was “concerned how it would be viewed by his wife,” and said
Trump asked Hicks to ensure that newspapers weren’t delivered to their
residence that morning.
She also testified that she didn’t believe Trump was specifically
concerned with how the story might impact his presidential campaign.
Prosecutors have argued that, in the wake of the “Access Hollywood” tape,
which had been made public a few weeks earlier, Trump sought to conceal
other unflattering stories about his conduct with women to protect his
political interests.
But Hicks said Trump did not seem overly concerned about the public
response to the tape, on which he is heard bragging about grabbing women’s
genitals. Trump, she said, believed the tape “wasn’t good,” but also was
“pretty standard stuff for two guys chatting.”
And again, Hicks testified that Trump’s main worry was his wife.
“President Trump really values Mrs. Trump’s opinion, and she doesn’t weigh
in all the time, but when she does it’s really meaningful to him.”
“He really, really respects what she has to say,” she continued. “I think
he was just concerned about what her perception of this would be.”
Still, elements of Hicks’ testimony are sure to help prosecutors’ case.
She described the fallout of the “Access Hollywood” tape as “intense,” so
much so that it overtook news coverage of a category 4 hurricane that had
been expected to make landfall on the East Coast.
She recounted how she and other campaign aides scrambled to respond to the
revelation. “There was consensus amongst us all that the tape was damaging
and this was a crisis,” she said.
And she recalled a conversation she had with Trump about a phone call he
had with his lawyer, Michael Cohen, the morning after Cohen told the New
York Times that he alone had paid the $130,000 to Daniels, without Trump’s
involvement.
“Mr. Trump was saying he had spoken to Michael and that Michael had paid
this woman to protect him from a false allegation,” she recalled. “And
that Michael felt like it was his job to protect him, and that that’s what
he was doing. And he did it out of the kindness of his own heart and he
never told anybody about it.”
Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo asked if that version of the events was
consistent with Hicks’ perception of Cohen, and Hicks offered a response
that suggested she didn’t believe Trump’s account of what had happened.
“I would say that would be out of character for Michael,” she said. “I
didn’t know Michael to be an especially charitable person or selfless
person,“ she said, describing him as “the kind of person who seeks
credit.”
Hicks said Trump told her “that he thought it was a generous thing to do,
and he was appreciative of the loyalty.” She also said Trump asked her if
it was preferable that they were contending with the story after the
election.
“Mr. Trump’s opinion was that it was better to be dealing with it now and
that it would have been bad to have that put out before the election,” she
testified.
That comment, perhaps the most damaging for Trump of Hicks’s testimony
because it aligned with prosecutors’ theory that Trump was seeking to
protect his campaign, marked the end of the direct examination of Hicks.
Moments later, she appeared overwhelmed with emotion, tearing up on the
witness stand and blotting her eyes with a tissue.
Justice Juan Merchan took a short break, allowing her to exit the room,
and when she returned, her eyes were red.
During cross-examination, Trump lawyer Emil Bove sought to distance Cohen
from Trump’s presidential campaign operations. Bove asked Hicks if Cohen
did things that “were frustrating” to the campaign, or that were
“unauthorized,” and if he “went rogue at times.”
“Yes,” Hicks replied.
Bove asked if Cohen did things that were not helpful to the campaign.
“Yes. I used to say that he liked to call himself a fixer or Mr. Fix It,
and it was only because he first broke it,” she said, laughing, “that he
was able to fix it.”
Before she left the stand, she offered one last bit of solace for her
former boss. Asked whether the Oval Office was a “chaotic” place in 2017,
she agreed, but cautioned that it wasn’t in a “bad way.”
As she responded, Trump attorney Todd Blanche, seated next to Trump,
flashed her a smile.
At first I suspected that Hope was just another bimbo appointed for her good looks however I have
come to respect her, regardless of what side she is on.
Unlike liars like Cassidy Hutchinson, Hope comes off as sincere regardless of what side she
supports.
--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.
Siri Cruise
2024-05-06 10:50:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by pothead
At first I suspected that Hope was just another bimbo appointed for her good looks however I have
come to respect her, regardless of what side she is on.
Unlike liars like Cassidy Hutchinson, Hope comes off as sincere regardless of what side she
supports.
She supports the prosecution. That's why they called her.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Governor Swill
2024-05-08 02:03:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
At first I suspected that Hope was just another bimbo appointed for her good looks however I have
come to respect her, regardless of what side she is on.
Unlike liars like Cassidy Hutchinson, Hope comes off as sincere regardless of what side she
supports.
She supports the prosecution. That's why they called her.
Hicks said Trump's primary motivation was to avoid embarrassing his family.

Bullshit.

This is a man who had been married twice, cheated on both wives and bragged *in print*
about committing adultery. How could Melania (or anybody else) be the least bit
surprised, let alone embarrassed?

Swill
--
Trump cites FBI stats to prove crime going down, 2019

<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/crime-down-does-president-trump-deserve-credit>

Trump dismisses FBI stats that prove crime is going down, 2024

<https://people.com/fact-check-trump-false-claims-crime-rates-8624660>


Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>
Loading...