Keith
2024-06-06 22:17:31 UTC
NEW YORK CITY (WABC) -- The implementation of congestion pricing in New
York City has been indefinitely postponed. It will not start on June 30 as
originally planned, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Wednesday.
The move marks a stunning reversal for public transit advocates who had
championed the tolls as a way of raising billions of dollars for New
York's beleaguered subway and commuter rail systems while reducing traffic
in the city's streets.
Hochul said that while she remains committed to the program's
environmental goals, implementing it now as New York City is still
recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic "risked too many unintended
consequences for New Yorkers at this time."
The tolling program had been scheduled to start June 30.
The governor framed her decision as economic, saying the city's recovery
from the pandemic is incomplete and "hard-working New Yorkers are getting
hammered on costs" for food, housing and childcare.
The governor expressed concern suburban commuters would choose to work
from home or skip recreational visits to the city. She said nothing about
politics, which undoubtedly played a role in her decision to instruct the
MTA to indefinitely pause implementation of congestion pricing.
"We remain fully committed to advancing all the improvements New Yorkers
have been promised," including track and signal repairs, security cameras
and the extension of the 2nd Av. subway line. She said the state had
already set aside funding for the MTA in case congestion pricing was held
up by the courts.
New York would have become the first U.S. city to join a handful globally
with similar congestion pricing schemes, including London, Stockholm,
Milan and Singapore, which is credited with pioneering the first such
program in 1975.
Most people driving passenger vehicles into Manhattan below 60th Street -
roughly the area south of Central Park - would have to pay at least $15
under the system, with larger vehicles paying more. Those tolls would come
on top of the already hefty tolls for using bridges and tunnels to enter
Manhattan, like the $13.38 to $17.63 it costs to take a car through the
Lincoln or Holland tunnels.
The MTA has already invested tens of millions of dollars installing
cameras, sensors, license plate readers and other equipment on city
roadways in anticipation of the plan's launch. The fee was expected to
provide an annual cash infusion of around $1 billion for subway and bus
systems that carry some 4 million riders daily.
The decision to delay also comes as Democrats are facing difficult House
races in the New York City suburbs. Republicans have planned to use
congestion pricing as a political wedge.
Congressman Mike Lawler, a Republican representing part of the Hudson
Valley, wasted no time in weighing in on the governor's decision.
"I think it's a great step in the right direction," said Mayor Mark
Sokolich, (D) Fort Lee. "We're not in Fort Lee trying to get the MTA to
not operate properly we're just trying to make sure there's fairness in
the process."
Sokolich said Fort Lee would have had to cope with a 25% traffic increase
throughout their area which would have negatively impacted the air
quality.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy said in part, "Although we have had a
difference of opinion with our colleagues in New York on congestion
pricing implementation, we have always had a shared vision for growing our
regional economy, investing in infrastructure, protecting our environment,
and creating good-paying jobs on both sides of the Hudson River. We fully
embrace the notion that the success of Manhattan is inextricably linked to
the prosperity of the entire Tri-State Area. Governor Hochul and Mayor
Adams have been strong, collaborative governing partners and I look
forward to continuing to work closely with them for the benefit of all of
our residents."
ALSO READ: NJ reaction to postponement of congestion pricing
On the flip side, Sam Schwartz, a transportation expert called the
decision by the governor, disappointing.
"I'm very disappointed, I thought the governor had a lot of courage to
proceed even though it was another governor that recommended it. I'm
disappointed by her saying the timing isn't now, the timing is now," he
said. "The reality is that the transit system will suffer."
The MTA, which would potentially face a $1 billion budget deficit without
implementation, declined to comment.
Members of the MTA board, which oversees the transit agency, said they had
not been briefed on the delay.
"I'm in shock," said Andrew Albert, a member of the board. "We won't get
new buses, new subway cars, new signals. It's a betrayal of the millions
and millions of people who would have been helped by this."
John Samuelsen, President of the Transport Workers Union of America, said
Hochul was warned about moving forward with the plan without having
"massive service improvements" already in place.
"This was the moment in time to do it. This is the moment in time to green
New York City, to increase public transit, to change commuter behavior and
she blew it! They flushed the moment down the toilet. They flushed the
moment down the toilet by not improving service for working people,"
Samuelsen said.
Hochul had been a vocal supporter of the plan, which was signed into law
by her predecessor, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in 2019.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams said Wednesday that he would support the
governor's decision to reassess. "If she's looking at what others we can
do it and how we can do it correctly, I'm all for it," he said. "This is a
major shift for our city and it has to be done correctly."
There were several lawsuits filed against congestion pricing, and one
official on Staten Island said they are waiting for a final decision by
the state before deciding what to do with their lawsuit.
"It's a little premature to make that decision because we don't know
what's going to come out of the state, once the state makes its official
position, then we'll decide what to do with the litigation," said Vito
Fossella, Staten Island Borough President.
On Long Island, Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman said that the
governor couldn't deny that the plan was a bad idea for the whole
metropolitan area coming out of the pandemic.
"I'm very grateful that the sole vote against this on the MTA was our
representative," Blakeman said. "I just hope that the governor isn't
contemplating a commuter tax on the suburbs."
There remains a belief that congestion pricing is inevitable. The plan
would charge a $15 toll for passenger cars driving south of 60th Street
from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays. There are certain exceptions. Several
lawsuits are challenging the plan.
https://abc7ny.com/post/congestion-pricing-nyc-kathy-hochul-start-
delay/14912968/
York City has been indefinitely postponed. It will not start on June 30 as
originally planned, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Wednesday.
The move marks a stunning reversal for public transit advocates who had
championed the tolls as a way of raising billions of dollars for New
York's beleaguered subway and commuter rail systems while reducing traffic
in the city's streets.
Hochul said that while she remains committed to the program's
environmental goals, implementing it now as New York City is still
recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic "risked too many unintended
consequences for New Yorkers at this time."
The tolling program had been scheduled to start June 30.
The governor framed her decision as economic, saying the city's recovery
from the pandemic is incomplete and "hard-working New Yorkers are getting
hammered on costs" for food, housing and childcare.
The governor expressed concern suburban commuters would choose to work
from home or skip recreational visits to the city. She said nothing about
politics, which undoubtedly played a role in her decision to instruct the
MTA to indefinitely pause implementation of congestion pricing.
"We remain fully committed to advancing all the improvements New Yorkers
have been promised," including track and signal repairs, security cameras
and the extension of the 2nd Av. subway line. She said the state had
already set aside funding for the MTA in case congestion pricing was held
up by the courts.
New York would have become the first U.S. city to join a handful globally
with similar congestion pricing schemes, including London, Stockholm,
Milan and Singapore, which is credited with pioneering the first such
program in 1975.
Most people driving passenger vehicles into Manhattan below 60th Street -
roughly the area south of Central Park - would have to pay at least $15
under the system, with larger vehicles paying more. Those tolls would come
on top of the already hefty tolls for using bridges and tunnels to enter
Manhattan, like the $13.38 to $17.63 it costs to take a car through the
Lincoln or Holland tunnels.
The MTA has already invested tens of millions of dollars installing
cameras, sensors, license plate readers and other equipment on city
roadways in anticipation of the plan's launch. The fee was expected to
provide an annual cash infusion of around $1 billion for subway and bus
systems that carry some 4 million riders daily.
The decision to delay also comes as Democrats are facing difficult House
races in the New York City suburbs. Republicans have planned to use
congestion pricing as a political wedge.
Congressman Mike Lawler, a Republican representing part of the Hudson
Valley, wasted no time in weighing in on the governor's decision.
"I think it's a great step in the right direction," said Mayor Mark
Sokolich, (D) Fort Lee. "We're not in Fort Lee trying to get the MTA to
not operate properly we're just trying to make sure there's fairness in
the process."
Sokolich said Fort Lee would have had to cope with a 25% traffic increase
throughout their area which would have negatively impacted the air
quality.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy said in part, "Although we have had a
difference of opinion with our colleagues in New York on congestion
pricing implementation, we have always had a shared vision for growing our
regional economy, investing in infrastructure, protecting our environment,
and creating good-paying jobs on both sides of the Hudson River. We fully
embrace the notion that the success of Manhattan is inextricably linked to
the prosperity of the entire Tri-State Area. Governor Hochul and Mayor
Adams have been strong, collaborative governing partners and I look
forward to continuing to work closely with them for the benefit of all of
our residents."
ALSO READ: NJ reaction to postponement of congestion pricing
On the flip side, Sam Schwartz, a transportation expert called the
decision by the governor, disappointing.
"I'm very disappointed, I thought the governor had a lot of courage to
proceed even though it was another governor that recommended it. I'm
disappointed by her saying the timing isn't now, the timing is now," he
said. "The reality is that the transit system will suffer."
The MTA, which would potentially face a $1 billion budget deficit without
implementation, declined to comment.
Members of the MTA board, which oversees the transit agency, said they had
not been briefed on the delay.
"I'm in shock," said Andrew Albert, a member of the board. "We won't get
new buses, new subway cars, new signals. It's a betrayal of the millions
and millions of people who would have been helped by this."
John Samuelsen, President of the Transport Workers Union of America, said
Hochul was warned about moving forward with the plan without having
"massive service improvements" already in place.
"This was the moment in time to do it. This is the moment in time to green
New York City, to increase public transit, to change commuter behavior and
she blew it! They flushed the moment down the toilet. They flushed the
moment down the toilet by not improving service for working people,"
Samuelsen said.
Hochul had been a vocal supporter of the plan, which was signed into law
by her predecessor, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in 2019.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams said Wednesday that he would support the
governor's decision to reassess. "If she's looking at what others we can
do it and how we can do it correctly, I'm all for it," he said. "This is a
major shift for our city and it has to be done correctly."
There were several lawsuits filed against congestion pricing, and one
official on Staten Island said they are waiting for a final decision by
the state before deciding what to do with their lawsuit.
"It's a little premature to make that decision because we don't know
what's going to come out of the state, once the state makes its official
position, then we'll decide what to do with the litigation," said Vito
Fossella, Staten Island Borough President.
On Long Island, Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman said that the
governor couldn't deny that the plan was a bad idea for the whole
metropolitan area coming out of the pandemic.
"I'm very grateful that the sole vote against this on the MTA was our
representative," Blakeman said. "I just hope that the governor isn't
contemplating a commuter tax on the suburbs."
There remains a belief that congestion pricing is inevitable. The plan
would charge a $15 toll for passenger cars driving south of 60th Street
from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays. There are certain exceptions. Several
lawsuits are challenging the plan.
https://abc7ny.com/post/congestion-pricing-nyc-kathy-hochul-start-
delay/14912968/